A Consideration on Disturbance Objection of Legitimate Expectation Principle with Some Administrative Law Principle

Document Type : Original Article

Author
PhD student of Public Law
Abstract
Legitimate Expectations are the same as citizens’ reasonable expectations which results from leaning to public officials’ decisions and definite representations in discretionary powers framework are that can be ruined by a rejection or annulations through new decisions and representations.
Despite the acceptance of this principle in the law system of some developed countries, unfortunately in some other countries, using this principle in administrative claims is in disturbance of executing some of other administrative law traditional principles such as “Separation of Powers Principle”, “legal Administration Principle”, “Administration Efficiency Principle”, “Principle of No-Fettering”, “Principle of No-Harm to Third Parties” and “Principle of No-Making Unreal Expectations” and due to this reason, discovering its identity has been avoided. A consideration in related reasons to legitimate expectation disturbance with other administrative law principles, perfectly shows that observing this principle, not only is not an obstacle for executing mentioned principle, but also is profitable and suitable in facilitating and accelerating their execution.
This paper has been worked on investigating and criticizing the disturbance objection of legitimate expectation as a legal principle with some other administrative law principles.
Keywords